[blog]
Why we price every AI decision before we build it, and what the numbers usually show.
Take the decision the system makes and price it: inference or API cost, licence share, data pipeline cost, and the people needed to run and monitor it, divided by the volume production will see. Then compare it to the value per decision from the Prove sprint.
Three patterns. Use cases that are attractive at pilot volume and marginal at production volume, usually because inference cost scales linearly with volume and value does not. Use cases where the people cost dominates and automation of the review step matters more than model quality. And use cases where the economics are so favourable that the only question is how fast to scale.
In the Find phase as a rough estimate to rank candidates. In Build as a working spreadsheet the owner can change. In Scale as a monitored metric alongside the outcome, because costs drift as models and volumes change.
A prototype flatters a use case because it runs at demo volume on curated data. The economics are what separates a demo from a business, and they are cheap to model early.
[related]
[share]
Copy the address bar link, or send this article to a colleague who owns the metric.
Tell us about the decision or workflow you want to change. We'll come back with an honest view on whether it's worth proving, and what it would take.
Start a conversation